Want to dream of painting a full stop at the end of the debate do not want to send this post this, but see my post to the Association, the officials or silence or avoidance or blame; have friends for my comfort and appeal. Miserable, I found my thoughts still not understood. Most people seem to want to major issues to minor ones, and that only I can stop stirring up trouble. Sad. . . I do not want 74, so I think other professions, we are greedy DD, the state holding the EOD attack strength of the beast plus point that reason and occupy the EOD. As long as the first to give a DD, I have not complained of. I think this is the default of the other DD’s. But, however, did not expect to understand that time is wrong, I think I can not go on in silence, it seems to rely on the council,cheap wow gold, the people’s support,wow powerleveling, mutual understanding, friendship and mutual assistance is impossible. So there is this question, I want to dream of the end of the debate draw a conclusion. Dawn Rune +48 spell damage for the dead, dawn of the dead Indian attack +81 strength. If the injury and the attack strength as a method based on the conversion, it still feasible. So the end of the dream is: EOD: +13 resistance +13 Intellect +95 spell damage +305 +5 seconds back 5 magic attack strength with this beast under the conversion, then 305 attack power equal to 180 spell damage, 95 spell damage: close to 1:2 of 180 spell damage. Take the AL for the first well-known: +33 resistance +86 weapon attack speed and strength second injury I do not really understand, but the focus of dispute soldiers and hunters are not very clear. However, if you change it, so +86 Attack Power +86 Ranged Attack Power becomes, then, I think the soldiers will never want. However, if there is such a weapon, the 86 is divided into two parts, according to the ratio of 95 than 180. Will appear: AL2: +33 resistance +30 Attack Power +56 Ranged Attack Power if such weapons, the soldiers will fight to get it? Hunters may give the soldiers do? The Association to define how the ownership of this weapon is a full-time hunter, or you fair auction? I created this weapon is a metaphor EOD 95 injured and 305 attack power law relationship. If someone says that the beast state D intensity in the raid in the attack useless, then look at this: AL3: +33 resistance +30 Attack Power +56 ranged attack power so outdoor what happened for hunters and soldiers concerned, and AL2 of difference in what? Will affect the distribution of it? Of course, the soldiers saw that there is a high resistance to damage and weapon speed. The EOD is 74 fancy injury law, it is more convincing, and reduce resistance, increase attack strength. AL4: +15 resistance +40 Attack Power +75 ranged attack power outside this result will only make more obvious distributional objectives. If the injury into law more: EOD2: Chi Sword +13 +13 +95 spell damage resistance +5 seconds back 5 +180 outdoor magic Frostbolt,wow gold safe, Fireball, then Arcane Missiles spell damage for this weapon (I replaced a sword), FS who will take you 74? Association may be assigned to discuss what kind of job and post it? Or, have braved the world of which 74 will be big as, hit points the EOD2 it. If so replace Frostbolt Shadow Bolt, Mage, Warlock saw the sword to get in 74 hands, would feel. What not to mention the outdoor 180 spell damage, spell damage and 95 can be superimposed in the outdoors, while the DD form of the French wounded, and beasts attack strength can not be superimposed. DD that I ask you practiced it? Know DD spells and physical attacks are the means to eat. There is also mention the +95 spell damage and spell damage +180 outdoor things will not happen, it is a BUG weapons, it pulls about: EOD3: Chi Sword +13 +95 +13-resistant indoor injury law <— – +5 seconds back 5 +180 outdoor magic Frostbolt, Fireball, Arcane Missiles spell damage though such things to normal weapons are weakened state, but if there is to see 74 FS holding EOD3, but also that this is Association of fairness embodied it? More than only physical type AL (change) and France injury type EOD (changed) made an analogy. But I would like to have been able to explain my idea, and I think that the EOD DD who is dedicated. Why not try to steal another 74 spell damage sword, dagger injury law, and specifically looking at EOD. I really do not understand, like sword, a dagger category, there are other hammer has a very high injury law, and the deviation does not exceed 10%, for example, resistance to hand, drop rate and the difference will not be too difficult to start and more. Therefore, there are 74 of my senior, who explained to DD, and make most people agree, I would think: This is the fear of Master 74, warlocks pain flat, and singled DD to bully. This is the DD has always been cold, discrimination, arbitrary trampling of expression! ! ! ! ! ! This is what I do more, but some people will say blue sky song, but there is no blue sky plus it features a professional. If BK additional 80 points added to the outdoor Shadowbolt spell damage, while the Association is that a fair bid, then please apply for employment being protected warlocks do not know the Society will not be accepted? People who play D, feisty, very few, most are holding a peaceful state of mind, but it does not mean that we can be free to bully. Monk will be angry. Now I feel like this, please according to your career, set into the idea of a good think I wrote above, if such a weapon (change) allocation conflicts in your body, how would you do, is not directly on the pan fried the. For the 74 who, I do not know that you can understand my thoughts, because I have no deep understanding of 74, unable to make a weapon designed specifically to 74 properties. And now, I want to initiate voting, but the title as a professional dedicated and fair bidding, a second election debate. Intellectual resistance +13 +13 + 5 +95 spell damage magic back to +180 Frostbolt, Fireball, Arcane Missiles spell damage (Sword) Master of exclusive OR-resistant fair bidding +13 +13 +95 Chi + back to the magic 5 Shadow Bolt spell damage +180 spell damage (Sword) Warlock exclusive OR fair bidding Chi + +13 +13 resistance to magic back injury law +180 5 +95 Holy Spell Damage (Swords) OR Knight exclusive fair bid + 13 anti-intellectual + +13 +95 spell damage back to the magic 5 +180 Shadow Shadow spell damage under the form (Mace) Pastor exclusive OR fair bidding power of +13 min +13 +13 +161 attack power +305 violent resistance profile the next melee attack power (main hand sword) warrior exclusive OR fair bidding power of +13 min +13 +13 +161 attack power +305 resistance to melee attack power by thieves (main hand dagger) (can not imagine how the assassin who lap out, the thieves had to write directly on the word) Thieves exclusive OR Min fair bidding +13 +13 +13 resistance force attack strength +305 +161 ranged attack power (main hand sword) +13 Hunter exclusive OR resistance + fair bidding Back to the magic 13 5 +95 Chi + spell damage +305 attack power beast form (Main Hand Mace) Druid fair competitive bidding for the exclusive OR MT weapons Yigai priority, not discussed here. Then, most important, in all it seems, you want this weapon, in addition to the professional, the other professional will not bid, that is, in any case will not be displaced to outside professional hands. But the reality is cruel,wow us gold, when there is a foreign occupation, I do not know why, you have to save the points you want to drop weapons, you think. And just this time, the Society issued a consultation of the vote, then, regardless of your hands of the DKP and more, or outside the professional and more, follow you at the moment the idea for your weapons, do not control EOD, cast solemn vote it. Furthermore, I want this weapon DKP as a very high score, so a low score in other occupations that got the epic equipment and complain. Finally, I reiterate, I always think that the EOD points to the first German to fight other DKP’s Association, is a good guild. I do not expect the D-specific EOD. These are just seeking extreme condition tests to see if they speak for the full DKP is how cognition. If you can draw a first conclusion of the sub to D, whether or not hindsight, I feel at ease.